top of page
General Principles
​
The standard of "reasonable doubt" does not apply when a judge is dealing with individual items of evidence and not the ultimate question of whether guilt was proved: R v MacIsaac, 2017 ONCA 172 at para 72
​
While the Crown is generally bound to prove the formal particulars of the offence charged, it is not bound to prove the theory that it advances in order to secure a conviction. Rather, a conviction is based on proof of the necessary elements of the offence. Accordingly, there is no general proposition that once the Crown presents a particular theory of a case, it would be unfairly prejudicial to the accused to allow the trier to convict on a different theory: R v Grandine, 2017 ONCA 718 at para 63
bottom of page